Preserving Armenia One Vote at a Time!
Second Nagorno-Karabakh War

Turkey, Russia, and the International Dimension

Part 1 of 21 · Second Nagorno-Karabakh War

Turkey, Russia, and the International Dimension

37. Turkey's Support for Azerbaijan

Turkey was Azerbaijan's most important external military and political supporter during the conflict.

The two countries had developed close relations based on shared linguistic and cultural connections, strategic cooperation, and common political interests.

Turkey had trained Azerbaijani military personnel and participated in joint exercises before the war.

Turkish-made military equipment, particularly the Bayraktar TB2, contributed significantly to Azerbaijan's capabilities.

Turkish political leaders publicly supported Azerbaijan's territorial claims and military objectives.

The Turkish government described Azerbaijan's operations as legitimate efforts to recover internationally recognized territory.

Turkey's support changed the diplomatic and military environment of the conflict.

It strengthened Azerbaijan's position and increased Ankara's influence in the South Caucasus.

38. Allegations and Evidence Concerning Syrian Fighters

During the war, reports emerged that Syrian fighters had been recruited and transported to Azerbaijan with Turkish involvement.

International journalists and human rights investigators collected testimony concerning recruitment networks, financial promises, and deployments.

Turkey and Azerbaijan denied allegations that Syrian mercenaries were fighting on Azerbaijan's behalf.

The United Nations Working Group on the use of mercenaries subsequently expressed concern about reports of Syrian fighters being deployed to the conflict.

The full number of fighters, their exact roles, and the complete chain of recruitment and command have not been conclusively established in public records.

Nevertheless, the allegations became a major international controversy and raised concerns about the internationalization of the conflict.

39. Russia's Position During the War

Russia maintained close political, military, and economic relations with Armenia while also maintaining significant relations with Azerbaijan.

Armenia was a member of the Russian-led Collective Security Treaty Organization.

Russia also maintained a military base in Armenia.

However, Moscow distinguished between an attack on the internationally recognized territory of Armenia and fighting within Nagorno-Karabakh, which Russia recognized as part of Azerbaijan.

Russia did not directly intervene to reverse Azerbaijan's military advances.

Instead, it pursued diplomatic efforts and attempted to broker ceasefires.

Moscow's position reflected several strategic interests: maintaining influence over both Armenia and Azerbaijan, avoiding direct confrontation with Turkey, preventing wider regional instability, and preserving a central role in conflict settlement.

40. Iran's Position

Iran shares borders with Armenia and Azerbaijan and has important security, economic, and cultural interests in the South Caucasus.

The war raised concerns in Tehran about fighting near its northern frontier.

Iran also expressed concern about the presence of foreign fighters and the possibility of changes to regional borders.

At the same time, Iran recognized Azerbaijan's territorial integrity and maintained relations with Armenia.

Iranian officials called for an end to hostilities and proposed diplomatic initiatives.

The conflict demonstrated the complexity of Iran's position as a neighboring state with significant Azerbaijani and Armenian historical connections.

41. The United States and France

The United States and France, alongside Russia, served as co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group.

Both governments called for an end to hostilities and supported negotiated settlement efforts.

France expressed particular concern about Turkey's role and the humanitarian situation.

The United States participated in diplomatic efforts, including a humanitarian ceasefire initiative announced in October.

Despite these efforts, the Minsk Group co-chairs were unable to secure a lasting ceasefire before Azerbaijan's decisive military advances.

The war exposed the limitations of the international mediation process.

42. The United Nations and International Organizations

The United Nations called for an end to the fighting and emphasized the protection of civilians.

Humanitarian organizations sought access to affected populations.

The International Committee of the Red Cross worked on matters involving prisoners, missing persons, the dead, and humanitarian assistance.

The conflict highlighted the difficulties international organizations face when operating in active war zones where access is restricted and the parties dispute responsibility for violations.

\n